Manage deliveries faster, cheaper and easier.

View Original

Why Proper Waste Tracking is Critical for Green Funding Compliance in Construction Projects: Insights from the EU Taxonomy Regulation

The construction industry is under increasing pressure to adopt sustainable practices, particularly as governments and financial institutions tie green funding to strict environmental standards. One of the most crucial aspects of achieving compliance with these standards is proper waste tracking. The EU Taxonomy Regulation (2020/852) sets out clear technical screening criteria that construction projects must meet to qualify for green funding. Proper waste management and resource use monitoring are essential for demonstrating compliance and securing investment. Here’s why.

1. Efficient Material Usage and Waste Reduction

The EU Taxonomy requires that construction projects ensure efficient material usage and minimise waste generation. The EU Taxonomy Regulation specifies that projects must contribute to environmental objectives, including waste prevention and resource efficiency. To comply, businesses need to track how materials are sourced, processed, and used throughout the project lifecycle .

Without accurate waste tracking, it becomes impossible to prove that the project has minimised waste, reused materials, and avoided sending unnecessary waste to landfills. Proper tracking allows companies to provide verifiable data showing that they meet these criteria, which is essential for aligning with green funding requirements.

2. Circular Economy and Reuse of Materials

A core principle of the EU Taxonomy is to promote a circular economy, where materials are recycled and reused rather than discarded. The EU Taxonomy Regulation mandates that construction projects must prioritise recycling and reuse over disposal, and proper waste tracking systems are key to proving compliance with this principle .

Waste tracking helps ensure that every material used in construction is accounted for, including how much is reused, recycled, or disposed of. Without this data, construction firms cannot demonstrate alignment with the circular economy goals outlined in the EU Taxonomy, which could jeopardise their eligibility for green funding.

3. Compliance with Waste Prevention Measures

Under the EU Taxonomy’s Do No Significant Harm (DNSH) criteria, construction activities must not harm other environmental objectives, such as waste reduction or pollution control. As part of this, the EU Taxonomy Regulation requires businesses to track and report on their efforts to prevent waste and reduce the environmental impact of their operations .

This means that construction companies must document and prove that they are actively preventing waste generation, using materials efficiently, and complying with all relevant environmental regulations. Waste tracking and data reporting are essential tools to meet these requirements and demonstrate compliance during audits.

4. Lifecycle Costing (LCC) and Lifecycle Analysis (LCA)

One of the most critical elements of green funding compliance is performing Lifecycle Costing (LCC) and Lifecycle Analysis (LCA) to evaluate the environmental impact of materials over their entire lifecycle. The EU Taxonomy requires that companies assess the impact of materials from extraction to disposal .

Accurate waste tracking is integral to these assessments, providing the data needed to evaluate material efficiency, waste generation, and recycling performance. By maintaining auditable records, construction companies can demonstrate that they are following the lifecycle analysis protocols necessary for meeting green funding criteria.

5. Audit-Ready Data and Reporting

The EU Taxonomy requires businesses seeking green funding to maintain audit-ready data that can be presented during inspections or audits. Construction companies must provide detailed reports on material usage, waste management, and compliance with sustainability standards .

Without reliable waste tracking systems, producing this data becomes a challenge. By implementing robust tracking processes, construction firms can ensure that they are always prepared for audits, and that their waste management practices are in line with EU regulations. This is crucial for proving compliance and maintaining access to green funding opportunities.

Conclusion

The EU Taxonomy Regulation makes it clear that proper waste tracking and resource monitoring are no longer optional for construction projects looking to secure green funding. Meeting the technical screening criteria requires accurate data on material usage, waste prevention, recycling, and disposal. By implementing effective waste tracking systems, companies can not only comply with the EU’s sustainability goals but also position themselves to benefit from green funding opportunities.

In an era where sustainable construction is increasingly important, ensuring compliance through proper waste tracking is critical for long-term success.