The Illusion of Accuracy: Where Developers Are Falling Short

Across the construction sector, many developers are still relying on outdated emissions tracking methods such as:

  • Generic emissions factor charts.

  • Manual reporting from subcontractors.

  • Fuel consumption estimates not adjusted for terrain, load, or idle time.

  • Paper logs that are prone to error or manipulation.

The problem? These methods produce numbers that may look convincing in a report, but won’t hold up under CSRD or investor-led audits.

Why This Matters for Scope 3 Emissions

Under the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), large companies must report indirect (Scope 3) emissions—especially those tied to logistics, subcontracted services, and supply chains.

This includes:

  • Site clearance activities and movement of spoil.

  • Muckaway operations, including off-site waste transfers.

  • Tipper truck logistics between quarries, sites, and depots.

Without real-time, journey-level data, you cannot accurately assign carbon outputs to a specific project, supplier, or county council tender. That leaves you exposed—both commercially and legally.

The Reality Check: Will Your Data Survive an ESG Audit?

Audit standards are shifting. Increasingly, investors, regulators, and public bodies want:

  • Transparent, verifiable data.

  • Automated logs with no manual interference.

  • Client- or project-level CO₂ attribution.

  • Auditable Scope 3 disclosures, not generic PDFs.

If your team is relying on ‘best guesses’, it’s likely those numbers will be:

  • Discredited in an audit.

  • Flagged as a greenwashing risk.

  • Rejected in a competitive county council or semi-state tender.

Bridging the Gap: Hub360 in Action

Hub360 closes the data integrity gap with by automatically linking emissions output to:

  • Material type and weight.

  • Specific trucks and drivers.

  • Individual projects, jobs, and clients.

  • Time of day, shift pattern, and route efficiency.

This transforms your CO₂ tracking from generic to granular, and from theoretical to auditable.

Use Case: Real-World Data in County Council Procurement

In a live project with Monaghan County Council, Hub360 tracked real-time emissions and tonnage for a national road resurfacing scheme. Outputs included:

  • CO₂ per shift.

  • Active haulage time per truck.

  • Comparison of full-load emissions vs return journeys.

  • Total project carbon footprint.

The Bottom Line

Guesswork is not a strategy. For developers, relying on estimations for Scope 3 reporting is a short-term patch with long-term risks.

With CSRD enforcement, ESG investor audits, and county-level carbon tracking on the rise, real-time, verifiable data is no longer a nice-to-have—it’s a business requirement

Previous
Previous

Win More Public Contracts: Why CO₂ Transparency Is the New Currency

Next
Next

Why Irish County Councils Must Rethink Material Movement and Emissions Reporting — Before It Becomes a Liability